Erdogan is viewed as a dictator by the media because he isn’t a dog for the west erdogan gave turkey a real military erdogan only did one thing badly and that was the economy but it’s not as bad claim it to be other than that erdogan is a great leader he made a lot of crazy projects and one of them is being built https://youtu.be/w__A1Lfy7wo erdogan is pushing turkey and making it more successful and yes he gets criticized for such projects because foreign countries don’t want a country that have such a leader with a vision they hate erodgan for that and erdogan is hated by western countries for being to control turkey the country that links the Middle East to Europe and such a geopolitical situation that makes turkey a powerhouse erdogan lifted bans on a lot of things that treated the Muslim turkeys like a minority erdogan removed the hijab ban erdogan simply gave Muslim Turks to practice their religion and he took in 6 million Syrians in that could be used as a great advantage for making them work for turkey like Sweden does erdogan granted people the freedom of practicing their religion and he let turkeys live a better life than the young Turks living conditions a lot of Turks who hate him are liberals who want turkey as an ally for the west and for it to become more western and people keep hating erdogan instead of appreciating him , a lot of military coups were made to overthrow him but all failed and you can see the people who stopped it it was Turkish citizens who know what would happen they knew if they didn’t stop it they would lose everything to a real dictatorship supported by the west Egypt is a great example the west doesn’t want people who aren’t puppets that don’t do as they say that don’t do such projects , the media was made to hate him https://youtu.be/tPQD_gDwRgg and the western media acted as if the military coup was a failed revolution that was gonna free the people but in reality it was gonna do nothing but make them slaves , erdogan knows . So Don’t you think I know this He also said he’s secular In a 2015/2016 Interview , Also most of the stuff he says is just that he can stay in power I really don’t care what he says Or what people say about him He made Turkey more Islamic And also lgbt protesters get the police And the police Does a good job Of stopping them , The thing is you have to understand Turkey isn’t under his full control And he can’t just go full Hitler when he gets power Yes it’s a long process But trust me erdogan is currently the best leader of turkey And if he goes All Muslim rights will too And lgbt rights will be given , western rights etc , https://youtu.be/n6UlADf-PiE Look https://oppressionstothehijab.wordpress.com/2008/02/12/erdogan-should-be-hung-for-lifting-hijab-ban/ They even fear him Because they know he’s playing them . Part 3

Who are you to say erdogan is a dictator erdogan won all the elections fair and square and who are you to be speak for all his people, bad dictator bad bad , the only reason people erdogan is called a dictator for the media is for not pleasing the liberals who control the media who hate Muslims and every thing they stand for they don’t want Muslim to to be Muslim they want Muslim to be cucks for their ideologies and who says a democracy is good , I would rather have a dictator who cares for his country than a democracy that’s their to serve western interest in the country . A great example of why a dictatorship is better than democracy is Libya under Gaddafis rule , Under Gaddafi’s rule 5 years ago, just before the US-backed/French-led NATO intervention into Libyan civil war in early 2011,

GDP per capita was USD$29,000(PPP basis) It is currently USD$11,000(PPP), more than a double drop in living standards. healthcare for Libyans were free, but now it is estimated that 2.5 million Libyans are in need of healthcare subsidies. Education was free and Illiteracy rate was 20%, but now 600 schools are closed and 270,000 Libyan youngsters have no school to attend. Sectarian violence were unheard of. Now there were tensions among all major clans And Just recently, a pet monkey attack on a schoolgirl sparks deadly clashes between clans which leave 20 dead. Household electricity was free and generous subsidies were given for weddings, housing and car purchase. Now Libyans have to pay full price for everything . A dictator who made a country that all men dream of , LIBYA: NOW A FAILING ECONOMY AFTER THE PAINFUL DEATH OF MUAMMAR GADDAFI In 1967, Colonel Gaddafi inherited one of the poorest nations in Africa; however, by the time he was assassinated in 2011, Gaddafi had turned Libya into one of Africa’s wealthiest nations. Libya had a high GDP per capita and life expectancy on the continent. Fewer people lived below the poverty line. After NATO’s intervention, Libya is now a failing state and its economy is in shambles. As the government’s control slips through their fingers and into the militia fighters’ hands, oil production has dwindled , the man had such a great system that liberal democracy could never beat , Prior to the death of Gaddafi, If a Libyan was unable to get employment after graduation the state would assist with a stipend as if he or she is employed until employment is found. A portion of every Libyan oil sale is credited directly to the bank accounts of all Libyan citizens. Seif al-Islam Gadhafi the son and favorite heir to the “Libyan throne” predicted that oil would be burned and what remained would hardly be useful to the country. Indeed, in the first nine months of 2015, Libya’s crude oil production averaged just slightly more than 400,000 barrels per day, significantly below the 1.65 million barrels per day average the country produced in 2010.

Some controversial views state that the West’s objective was not to help the Libyan people (who already had one of the highest standards of living in Africa) but to oust Gaddafi, install a puppet regime and gain control of Libya’s natural resources. Others like Russia’s Special envoy Mikhail Margelov warned that the war could continue in spite of Gaddafi’s death. According to Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, the killing of Gaddafi violated the Geneva Conventions prohibiting the summary execution of prisoners of war. Vladimir Putin said “All the world saw him being killed, all bloodied. Is that democracy? And who did it? Drones, including American ones, delivered a strike on his motorcade. Then commandos, who were not supposed to be there, brought in so-called opposition and militants. And killed him without trial . This is the justice of so called liberal democracy , why dictatorship is better than democracy, 1. The very first reason is definitely because Democracy always leads to Political instability. You can see most of the countries around the world running democracy have weak Political system. They are so weak that it appears very messy to run the government. Democracy involves competition among Political parties to win elections. As the number of Political parties rises it becomes more and more difficult to run the government even if the ruling party is not a coalition. Political Instability inhibits the development of a nation. This is a serious issue for developing nation. On the other hand Dictatorship eliminates the Political instability as only one ruler (or dictator) rules the country.

Democracy is not successful in removal of evil scam or corruption. Democracies often frustrate the needs of the people and often ignore the demands of a majority of its population. This routine tales of scams and corruption are enough to convince us that democracy is not free of this evil. At the same time, there is nothing to show that countries running dictatorship are less corrupt or more sensitive to people Democracy generally leads to poor growth of country’s economy. If you consider all the democracies and all the non-democracies between 1950 and 2000, dictatorships have slightly better growth rate. Consider the case of China and USA. USA is a very old democracy which has achieved such economic growth in 200 years whereas China running a non-democratic government has achieved similar economic growth pattern in 60 years. The inability of democracy to provide higher economic rates worries economists all over the world.

Democracy are believed to reduce economic disparities between people. But it is not so. In democracies, we find a large number of ultra-rich enjoying highly dispropotionate share of wealth and incomes. Not only that, their share in total income of the country has been increasing; those on the bottom of the society has very less to depend upon. Their incomes have been declining. Sometimes they find it difficult to meet their basic needs of life, such as food, clothing, house, education and health. In actual life democracies doesn’t seem to be very successful in reducing economic disparities. Democracies often delay the decision-making process. In democracy a large number of people has to consulted in taking a particular decision. Hence huge amount of time is wasted in decision-making. Dictators however take quick decision leading to better time management. In modern democracies, most of the political parties are not well-formed. They lack internal democracy. Dynastic succession is another challenge to Political parties. The growing money and muscle power among parties worries democrats all over the world. On the other hand, Dictatorship has no political parties, so they are better handled. In democracies, struggles and movements by different communities is very common. This generally leads to widespread violence and destruction of public properties. Not much action could be taken by the government as it is the fundamental right of people to take out protests and movements to get their rights. On the other hand many struggles and movements are suppressed by the dictators avoiding widespread destruction.